Case Analysis Strabag International GmbH v National Irrigation Authority (2024)
Case Analysis Strabag International GmbH v National Irrigation Authority (2024)

Case Analysis: Strabag International GmbH v National Irrigation Authority (2024)

Case Analysis: Strabag International GmbH v National Irrigation Authority (2024)

High Court of Kenya at Nairobi | Civil Case No. E176 of 2023 | Justice A. Mabeya | Delivered April 19, 2024

Key Takeaways

 Binding Nature of DAB Decisions: FIDIC Clause 20.4 mandates immediate compliance with Dispute Board (DB) rulings unless overturned by arbitration or settlement.
 Arbitration Defense Time-Barred: A party must invoke arbitration at the first opportunity (per Kenya’s Arbitration Act, Section 6); delay renders the defense invalid.
 Summary Judgment Upheld: Courts will enforce liquidated claims derived from binding contractual mechanisms where no triable defense exists.

 

Background

  • Parties:

    • Plaintiff: Strabag International GmbH (German construction firm).

    • Defendant: National Irrigation Authority (NIA), Kenya.

  • Contract: FIDIC-based agreement for an irrigation project (Kshs. 8.2 billion).

  • Dispute Mechanism: A Dispute Board (DB) issued five binding decisions (Referrals Nos. 6–10) on claims under the contract.

Comments

No comments yet. Why don’t you start the discussion?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *